
Bug
TR
₺ 50,000
Ekim Mağden' More From
ABSTRACT GRAFFITI
These figurative works, which I call Abstract Graffiti, are a painting practice that investigates the relationship between gesture, body, repetition, urban surface, and visual identity. The works reconstruct a visual language belonging to public space on wooden panels, by bringing graffiti's direct and personal act of marking into dialogue with painting's historical understanding of gesture.
The surfaces I create with acrylic paint on wooden panels are treated not as the background of a single image, but as layered and continuously transforming palimpsests. The overlapping, obscuring, revealing, and partial erasure of different colors evokes the visual memory of urban walls that have been painted over, worn down, and rewritten countless times. The surface thus ceases to be the passive ground of the painting; it becomes an active space that carries its own past, onto which new marks are added.
The acrylic tag marker I use on this surface takes the line beyond being merely a contour. While tracing the boundaries of the figures, I follow the continuity and rhythm of a tag action by lifting my hand as little as possible. I am not "drawing" predetermined figures in the traditional sense; I establish a direct relationship between the movement of the hand and the emergence of the figure. For this reason, the line is, before anything else, a bodily trace, a record of gesture and action.
This approach enters into dialogue with the historical legacy of Jackson Pollock's gestural understanding — which transforms the painting surface into a field of bodily movement — and Jean-Michel Basquiat's language of street-derived signs, writing, figures, and direct drawing. However, the aim here is not to reproduce these artists' visual languages; rather, it is to rethink the shared performative roots of abstract expressionist gesture and the graffiti tag within a contemporary figurative system.
As the line is repeated, figures multiply. Faces, bodies, and organic forms that emerge side by side, overlapping, and interlocking with one another are never exact replicas of each other. Figures that derive from one another behave like variations and visual mutations. The singular figure gradually loses its importance; in its place emerges a collective body, an anonymous crowd, or an organism that multiplies within itself. The convergence of forms evoking the human and the animal, in particular, further blurs the fixed and definitive boundaries of identity.
Here, graffiti's quality as a "signature" also transforms. The tag is normally an act of making oneself visible in public space, of saying "I was here." In my practice, however, this personal mark multiplies as it is repeated, transforms into the boundary of the figure, and eventually begins to dissolve individual identity within an anonymous visual crowd. The signature transforms from identity into pattern; from pattern into body; from body back into a mark.
The colored, patternless area I leave around the compositions creates a second context for this transformation. This area, functioning like a kind of mat, implies a fragment of wall torn from the street, or the reframing of a public surface within a gallery. The work thus positions itself on the boundary between public space and institutional art space, between the free mark and the framed art object.
Abstract Graffiti, in this sense, goes beyond being a series that transposes graffiti aesthetics into painting. The works investigate how gesture produces identity, how repetition transforms individuality, and how marks left on a surface become a form of visual memory.
The figures that ultimately emerge are neither purely portraits nor purely patterns. They are visual organisms formed by the superimposition of body, mark, memory, and movement. Painting here transforms less into a representation of an image, and more into a record of a continuous process of becoming that takes place on a surface.