
Caesar
TR
Mixed media on wood panel
₺ 52,000
Ekim Mağden' More From
ABSTRACT GRAFFITI
These figurative works, which I call Abstract Graffiti, are a painting practice that investigates the relationship between gesture, body, repetition, urban surface, and visual identity. The works juxtapose graffiti's direct and personal act of marking with painting's historical understanding of gesture, reconstructing a visual language belonging to public space on wooden panels.
The surfaces I create with acrylic paint on wooden panels are treated not as the background of a single image, but as layered and continuously transforming palimpsests. The overlapping of different colors, the way they cover, reveal, and partially erase one another, evokes the visual memory of urban walls that have been painted over, weathered, and rewritten countless times. The surface thus ceases to be the passive ground of painting; it becomes an active field that carries its own past, onto which new marks are added.
The acrylic tag marker I use on this surface takes the line beyond being merely a contour. While drawing the boundaries of figures, I follow the continuity and rhythm of a tagging act, lifting my hand as little as possible. I do not "draw" predetermined figures in the traditional sense; I establish a direct relationship between the movement of the hand and the emergence of the figure. For this reason, the line is, before anything else, a bodily trace, a record of gesture and action.
This approach enters into dialogue with Jackson Pollock's understanding of gesture — which transforms the painting surface into a field of bodily movement — and with the historical legacy of Jean-Michel Basquiat's street-derived language of signs, writing, figures, and direct mark-making. However, the aim here is not to reproduce the visual language of these artists, but to reconsider the shared performative roots of abstract expressionist gesture and the graffiti tag within a contemporary figurative system.
As the line is repeated, figures multiply. Faces, bodies, and organic forms that emerge side by side, layered, and intertwined are never exact replicas of one another. Figures that derive from one another behave like variations and visual mutations. The singular figure gradually loses its importance; in its place emerges a collective body, an anonymous crowd, or an organism multiplying within itself. The convergence of forms that evoke the human and the animal in particular further blurs the fixed and definitive boundaries of identity.
Here, the "signature" quality of graffiti also transforms. A tag is normally the act of making oneself visible in public space, of saying "I was here." In my practice, however, this personal mark multiplies as it is repeated, turns into the boundary of the figure, and eventually begins to dissolve individual identity within an anonymous visual crowd. The signature transforms from identity into pattern; from pattern into body; from body back into a mark.
The colored and patternless area I leave around the compositions creates a second context for this transformation. Operating like a kind of mat, this area implies a fragment of wall torn from the street, or the reframing of a public surface within a gallery. In this way, the work is positioned on the boundary between public space and institutional art space, between the free mark and the framed art object.
Abstract Graffiti, in this sense, goes beyond being a series that brings graffiti aesthetics into painting. The works investigate how gesture produces identity, how repetition transforms individuality, and how marks left on a surface turn into visual memory.
The figures that ultimately emerge are neither purely portraits nor purely patterns. They are visual organisms formed by the layering of body, mark, memory, and movement. Here, painting transforms less into a representation of an image and more into a record of a continuous process of becoming that takes place on a surface.
I worked on it.